|
Exploring
North Carolina Recuperation Barrens
On
a spring day in 1969 Gary Lewis, laboriously rolling his wheelchair along
the sidewalk in Greenville, faced a doubtful and depressing future. He
was returning from a long stay in a Veterans Administration hospital.
Since he was merely disabled from an automobile accident that left his
legs paralyzed, but was not an alcoholic, not blind, deaf, mentally ill,
retarded, or a convicted criminal, there was no place he could go in North
Carolina where any public agency would help him prepare himself in any
comprehensive way to earn his familys daily bread. The most he could
hope for at the time was a job in a sheltered workshop, where he might
frame pictures, refinish furniture, or do someother work for a minimum
or sub-minimum wage.
Before the
1970s, North Carolina possessed several hospital-based units where orthopedists
provided physical restoration. Gary had gone through all the orthopedic
surgery that would do him any good. He could have found in one of the
16 district offices of the states Vocational Rehabilitation Agencya
division established in 1920 in the Department of Public Instructiona
counselor to give him individual counseling, with some support from private
physicians and psychologists. There were also 90 cooperative facilities
and programs in hospitals, mental health clinics, and sheltered workshops.
The cooperative programs ranged from one-man counseling services to large
residential units in university and psychiatric hospitals, sanatoriums,
correctional facilities, and social service departments. None provided
a full spectrum of rehabilitation assistance that would lead Gary back
to where he could function as a productive adult.
In nearby
states he could have found his way to the Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation
Center at Fishersville, Virginia, or the West Virginia Rehabilitation
Center at Institute, near Charleston. In six other states in the country
he could have availed himself of extensive services in diversified centers
dedicated to vocational rehabilitation.
The Smith-Sears
Veterans Vocational Rehabilitation Act in 1918 established the first federal
vocational rehabilitation program. In 1920, Congress passed the Fess-Smith
Civilian Vocational Rehabilitation Act extending the program to non-veterans.
Not until Congress amended the Vocational Rehabilitation Act in 1954,
authorizing grants to expand programs for people with physical disabilities,
did the N.C. Rehabilitation Agency receive limited authority to use its
resources for rehabilitation centers. Until the early 1960s, federal funds
were very limited, and were used almost entirely to assist individuals.
Between 1960 and 1970, federal appropriations for vocational rehabilitation
grew from about $50 million to more than $550 million, opening new opportunities
to provide service and facilities for disabled persons not previously
considered as candidates for rehabilitation. Through 1967, the mentally
retarded and mentally ill were given priority, with facilities being set
up at all the state operated mental health institutions. Beyond this,
about 35 community sheltered workshops were established.
Following
further amendments to the federal Rehabilitation Acts of 1965 and 1968,
services were expanded to people suffering from stroke, heart problems,
respiratory conditions, nervous system damage, and orthopedic problems.
The state Vocational Rehabilitation Agency set up a planning and development
section that surveyed the existing rehabilitation facilities, identifying
sites in Asheville, Winston-Salem, Chapel Hill, and Durham where programs
serving severely physically disabled patients might be expanded. The survey
found no substantial rehabilitation programs east of Raleigh.
Following the survey, the agency formed a plan to establish a state-wide
system of regional centers expanding the existing facilities and developing
additional ones, especially in eastern North Carolina. A two-year study
in vocational rehabilitation, completed in December 1968, recommended
setting up comprehensive centers to rehabilitate persons suffering from
serious multiple disabilities.
The General
Assembly in House Bill 1320, effective July 1, 1969, appropriated funds
and requested the State Board of Education to study the states needs
for comprehensive vocational rehabilitation centers, and to begin planning
to set up such centers in chosen locations. These centers were to emphasize
medical, psychological, social, and vocational assistance to help persons
with physical handicaps live productively in their communities. The boards
final report, with recommendations for designing, locating, and equipping
facilities for the handicapped, was to be completed and presented to the
governor and the 1971 General Assembly.
According
to the May 19, 1970 Daily Reflector, Eugene R. Keener, state program planning
supervisor with the N.C. Division of Vocational Rehabilitation, had already
said that a recommendation would be presented to the General Assembly
in July in favor of locating a rehabilitation center in Greenville. Goldsboro
and Wilson had also bid for location of the center, and both cities offered
buildings and building sites. Asheville had offered Thoms Rehabilitation
Hospital, lock, stock, and barrel, for a regional facility.
A new building
would have to be built in Greenville, but the justification for locating
a regional rehabilitation center in Greenville was solid. It satisfied
all the criteria the committee had set up: central location in eastern
North Carolina; a nearby large hospital, which Pitt County Memorial Hospital
would be once its new construction was completed; existing rehabilitation
manpower and training programs for such manpower; local organizations
to provide financial and personnel support; a four-year university, with
a medical school proposed for biennium 1971-73, and the potential for
being barrier-free; a local community college; existing rehabilitation
facilities, such as the Alcoholic Rehabilitation Center established in
Pitt County in 1965; and a local sheltered workshop. The rehabilitation
counseling, occupational therapy, speech pathology and audiology, psychology,
nursing, sociology, and anthropology, medical technology, physical therapy,
social work, and other training programs available at ECU were further
points that favored locating the center in Greenville.
ECU administration
announced in May 1970 that the university might provide some funds if
the hospital bond issue passed, to ensure access to community facilities
for teaching. The Division of Vocational Rehabilitation might help, and
there might be funds from other private and public sources. Donations,
grants, or other funding would decrease the $9 million in bonds that would
have to be sold.
Despite the
early recommendation of the vocational rehabilitation divisions
assistant director, there were still many barriers political, financial,
and architectural to be eliminated.
When the study
and report were issued, they emphasized the centers comprehensive
nature. It would be an environment in which people from different health
professions would interact with disabled persons, giving them the assistance
they needed to achieve fully productive lives in their communities.
Because there
was no comprehensive vocational rehabilitation center in the state, the
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation staff and a 24-member State Advisory
Committee on Rehabilitation Facilities created to carry out the study
visited the best centers in some other states, and consulted with governmental
and voluntary agency leaders.
Irrigating
the Desert
Dr.
Edwin H. Martinat, an orthopedic surgeon from Bowman-Gray medical school,
was named committee chairman. Two committee members were appointed from
Greenville: Sheldon C. Downes, Ed. D., coordinator of rehabilitation counselor
education in the ECU School of Education; and Edwin W. Monroe, M. D.,
dean of the ECU School of Allied Health Professions. The other 21 members
were from Asheville, Butner, Chapel Hill, Charlotte, Durham, Fayetteville,
Goldsboro, Laurinburg, Raleigh, Wilson, and Winston-Salem.
In Greenville,
interested persons formed the Rehabilitation Center Committtee in late
1970 and early 1971 to support locating a regional rehabilitation center
in the city. The committee members included H. E.(Sonny) Lowry,
who was chairman, Sheldon Downes, George Hamilton, Joe Pou, William Speight,
Ralph Steele, and Richard Wells. The local medical community was represented
by Drs. Earl Trevathan, James F. Bowman, Sellars Crisp, Al Ferguson, Ira
Hardy, Monroe (later replaced by Ronald Thiele), Allen Taylor, and John
Wooten. Members of the local committee met with R. T. Capt. Tim
Brinn of the ECU Regional Development Institute to document, in a 72-page
brochure, Greenvilles case for establishing a regional rehabilitation
center in Pitt County. The main text included facsimiles of letters from
officials, community organizations, businessmen and professionals supporting
the concept of the rehabilitation center. The committee raised enough
money to print individualized, named copies of the book to present to
local supporters, Gov. Robert W. Scott, and all the legislators who would
act on the eventual location of the center.
Bill Speight,
Pitt County attorney, went to the governors office along with other
members of the committee. He found Scott unsmiling and not very friendly,
and when he presented him with Greenvilles plan, the governor said,
You people in Greenville just got approved for a medical school.
What more do you want?
It must be
added that Gov. Scott shifted to a more favorable position after Greenvilles
rehab center proponents combined with those from Fayetteville in their
joint campaign. In the meantime, state Senators J. J. Harrington, John
Hensley, Kenneth Royall, and Vernon White, and state Representatives Sam
Bundy and Horton Rountree had spoken to him about the economic and other
advantages of having a vocational rehabilitation center in Greenville.
The governor wrote on June 3, 1971 to Vernon Cox, chairman of the Pitt
County Commissioners, Please be assured of my concern for such a
worthy program, and my sincere hope that, if sufficient funds are found
to be available, the appropriations bill for these centers can be ratified.
I feel the humanitarian and economic benefits of the two rehabilitation
facilities for the east, advanced planning for a state rehabilitation
institute at Chapel Hill, and rehabilitation counseling units for general
hospital patients in western, central, and eastern North Carolina deserve
full consideration by the 1971 General Assembly.
On June 7,
Dr. Ira Hardy, as spokesman for the Greenville committee, visited Douglas
Herring, State Board of Education chairman, and presented arguments to
the board for Greenville as the ideal location for a center.
The main question
discussed at the start was whether or not there should be a single central
location, like the Woodrow Wilson Rehabilitation Center in Virginia, the
West Virginia Rehabilitation Center, and the Warm Springs Foundation in
Georgia, or regional centers placed strategically across the state. The
committee decided in favor of multiple regional centers.
The various
committee members vigorously represented their own areas interests.
Dr. John McCain was staunchly in favor of locating a center at the unused
Eastern North Carolina Sanatorium in Wilson, a state-owned 160-170-bed
hospital. He was supported in the endeavor by Rufus Swain of Wilson County
Technical Institute, who also spoke about Atlantic Christian College with
its B. A. programs in nursing, medical technology, and deaf education.
Dr. Robert
Brashear, Jr., from UNC School of Medicines Division of Orthopedic
Surgery and Robert A. Lassiter, Ph. D., of the School of Education at
UNC, declared firmly, although they were not quite prepared to define
the exact site, that Chapel Hill deserved most of all to be the location
of a state rehabilitation institute, since it was so centrally located,
had the UNC and Duke University medical schools to draw onfailing
to mention that the sole rehabilitation facility at Chapel Hill was a
single ward in Memorial Hospital, or that the campus was nowhere near
barrier-free. Moreover, Ferebee Taylor, UNC chancellor, had ruled that
the university had already made adequate arrangements for handicapped
students, would not alter its admission policy in any way as a concession
to handicapped applicants, nor spoil its beautiful campus by providing
ramps and other facilities for the handicapped.
Members of
the rehabilitation advisory committee, accompanied by Dr. George Hamilton,
Larry Snyder, and Sheldon Downes from ECU, visited the campus of the University
of Illinois campus in Champaign, IL, which was a pioneer, having been
barrier-free since the 1950s; the Rancho Los Amigos Hospital in Downey,
CA, and Casa Colina Hospital for Rehabilitation Medicine, in Pomona, CA;
Craig Rehabilitation Hospital in Denver, CO; and four other centers in
Pennsylvania, Virginia, and West Virginia. On the basis of these visits,
and advice from their administrators, medical directors, and staff, and
other experts on rehabilitation facilities, the advisory committee developed
an Ideal Model for a Comprehensive Statewide System of Rehabilitation
Services for the Physically Disabled in North Carolina.
The ideal
model, presented in the committees final report, included a variety
of rehabilitation services at the local,
regional, and state levels:
1. Locally,
there should be hospital rehabilitation units, mobile hospital units,
and vocational rehabilitation evaluation
and service centers where district offices already existed.
2. Regionally,
comprehensive vocational rehabilitation centers should be set up in conjunction
with large general,
acute hospitals, to deal with patients for whom local facilities were
insufficient.
3. To serve
the entire state, there should be a state rehabilitation institute to
serve physically handicapped persons
for whom regional facilities would be inadequate, and a state rehabilitation
center for the deaf.
Public hearings
were mounted in Asheville, Charlotte, Durham, Greensboro, Greenville,
and Raleigh during November 1970. There was one curious and unexplained
incident. The tapes made on the several recorders at the Greenville hearing
could not be transcribed because all were blank. It was as if the hearing
had never occurred.
In Raleigh
on January 7, 1971 presentations were made by Fayetteville, Pinehurst,
Greenville, and Wilson.
After all
the hearings and presentations, a consultant was brought in from the University
of Virginia in Charlottesville to provide unbiased outside advice on the
decision where to locate the center. Since there were no transcripts of
the public hearing in Greenville, he took the statement of John McCain,
chairman of the Central Coastal Plain Health Planning Council located
in Wilson, as definitive for eastern North Carolina, and recommended that
the center be located there.
The situation
was seen by the Greenville group to be at an acute stage. They had to
do something to retrieve their preeminent position. They sought a political
answer. At the time the General Assembly members from the Fayetteville
area were more influential than those from the Pitt County area. Committee
members approached the Fayetteville representatives and suggested that
they combine their forces. If you support us, well support
you, they said, to ensure that regional centers were located in
both Fayetteville and Greenville.
A Regional Rehabilitation Center for Greenville
The
alliance succeeded, and the final report of the State Board of Education
proposed that two regional centers should be established in Fayetteville
and Greenville, funded through a combination of federal, state, and local
funds. Drawing on Vocational Rehabilitation and Hill-Burton funds, the
federal participation for new construction could be as much as 61 percent.
The remaining 39 percent would include 24 percent state funds and 15 percent
local funds. The regional centers would operate through their local county
governments, with the state sharing in their cost on the same basis as
that for funding regional mental health facilities.
The community
components of the centers, operating in affiliated universities, community
colleges, and sheltered workshops, would involve removing architectural
barriers and employing special project staff. Federal Vocational Rehabilitation
funds could be used for barrier removal at technical institutes and community
colleges. Staff costs, which would amount to about 65 to 70 percent of
the operating budget, would be funded by colleges and universities, using
local and state funds, by technical institutes and communities colleges,
utilizing funds matched with federal vocational education funds, and by
sheltered workshops using existing staff or, if needed, additional staff
paid from vocational rehabilitation funds.
The estimated
total cost for constructing and equipping a regional rehabilitation center
in Greenville would be about $1.8 million, and estimated annual operating
costs would be $1.25 million.
It was essential for the ECU campus to be barrier free. The first phase
of removing architectural obstacles on the campus was estimated by the
Division of Vocational Rehabilitation to cost $50,000, and they were prepared
to furnish $40,000. ECU administrators were no more unified than usual.
Jim Lowry, director of Buildings and Grounds, resisted any architectural
changes to improve access to campus facilities. Dr. Downes, representing
the Greenville committee, approached Cliff Moore, the universitys
financial manager. Moore told him that there were no funds to pay for
barrier removal.
To stop here
would have left the project dead in the water, so Downes went to President
Jenkins and explained the situation. All the work that the committee had
done would be lost if the essential requirement to remove all architectural
barriers were not satisfied. It did not hurt that Downes, who was a Marine
as was Jenkins, could talk the talk and walk the walk. Jenkins responded
positively, saying that the issue was bigger than just the regional center.
The universitys goal was to serve all the people in the region,
and it would be inexcusable if physically handicapped students were prevented
from attending classes and other university functions.
He made a
telephone call to Moore, and the $10,000 was immediately available. Several
months later, following a 20 percent/80 percent formula, the university
provided another $10,000 to match an additional $40,000 to complete removing
architectural barriers. Even with the funds available, it was only through
the strong support of the university engineer, Larry Snyder, who for the
necessary length of time managed to circumvent the interference of Jim
Lowry, his supervisor, that the required changes in campus accessibility
were brought about.
The 1971 General
Assembly authorized $1.9 million to construct the rehabilitation center
at PCMH to open around Easter 1977. The section of the hospital containing
the center would become the final center in a system of five regional
centers and one state institute. With the systems completion, anyone
in the state would be able to begin rehabilitation care within 75 to 100
miles of home.
On October 11, 1971, the Pitt County commissioners passed a resolution
to expand the hospital by establishing a Regional Rehabilitation Center
as part of the new PCMH. The commissioners promised $881,000 toward constructing
the 55-bed rehabilitation center, the balance to be provided from federal
and state rehabilitation grants.
The ground-breaking
ceremony to inaugurate construction of the new Pitt County Memorial Hospital
was held on Thursday, February 14, 1974, Valentines Day. The facility
on Stantonsburg Road was to include a 315-bed acute care hospital and
a 55-bed regional rehabilitation center, and was scheduled for completion
in September 1977. R.L. Bob Martin, chairman of the county
commissioners, said the new facility would tie in with developing the
ECU medical school.
Dr. Edgar
T. Beddingfield, Jr., a Wilson physician who was very active in campaigning
for the medical school at ECU, spoke on January 7, 1971, to the final
Raleigh meeting before the State Board of Education. After reviewing the
reasons why Wilson should be the site for a regional center rather than
Greenville, he said, In closing, I must confess that in observing
your current and perhaps justified predilection for the Greenville location,
I feel a bit like the ever-faithful but rejected lover, who on seeing
his girl friend cast him aside and go on to a new relationship with another
man, told her plaintively, Honey, I still love you just the same.
If this new affair that you have become involved in doesnt work
out, come on backIll be waiting. So, Ladies and Gentlemen,
if the limitations of funds available, or other factors throw a roadblock
in the development of the facility at any other site than Wilson, we want
to remind you that we will be there waiting and ready to go at your pleasure.
Thank you very much.
By 1995,
12 rehabilitation centers for the physically disabled had been established,
including those in Fayetteville and Greenville. The others were in Asheville,
Charlotte, Winston-Salem (the John C. Whitaker Regional Rehabilitation
Center and the Rehabilitation Center at North Carolina Baptist Hospital),
Greensboro, Raleigh, Hickory, Chapel Hill, Durham, and Wilmington.
The
First Three Directors
The
first director of the Regional Rehabilitation Center was Dave McRae, who
came from Raleigh, where he was directing a nursing home and attending
graduate school. It was an inside joke among some PCMH staff that McRae
had been Jack Richardsons second choice for the position. Richardson
had in mind a man who came from eastern North Carolina, but was persuaded
that he needed someone with more of a professional background than his
favorite candidate.
McRae started
in March 1976 as associate director for rehabilitation. Like the other
executives at PCMH at the time, he found himself doing whatever had to
be done. The challenges were great, but the situation was conducive to
learning a great deal about the hospitals operation, as problems
and crises arose and had to be met. During the 13 years he spent in administration,
he had six or seven different jobs, and had become familiar with virtually
every area of managing the hospital.
The approach
to rehabilitation at the PCMH center was unique in that it not only made
facilities more easily available, but provided complete patient care,
dealing with the real problems faced by the disabled. Through being near
the patients homes and families, it could make a difference in their
feelings, how they viewed the world, and their motivation to learn what
they needed in order to function. As McRae said, Because of the
extent of their problems, you dont treat just the patient. Rehabilitation
involves being into the community.
The center
mobilized an entire community to help disabled people learn to function
in real life, not separating the person for long periods of time from
his home and people.
McRae directed
the rehabilitation center until Deborah Davis, after working for him for
several years, assumed the position. She joined his staff after working
in materials services, in the basement of the Fifth Street hospital. She
was also still in graduate school. Her first task was to prepare for CARF
to review the rehabilitation operation with an eye to accreditation. It
took about a year to get ready for the accreditation review. During that
period and for a time afterward, Mrs. Davis worked to complete her masters
in business administration.
She also worked
with McRae after he moved to the Human Resosurces division, then taking
on clinical services, and gradually moving into overseeing daily operations.
In 1990 she was senior vice president with responsibility for the entire
operation of PCMH patient services, clinical operations, support
services, and facilities. Everything for the daily operations for
PCMH reports, through an executive staff member, to me, she said.
After Mrs.
Davis, Martha M. Dixon became the rehabilitation centers director.
She had been employed in the center in 1977 as its first speech and language
pathologist. The next year, she became the manager of the Department of
Speech Language Pathology and Audiology at the hospital, a position she
held for several years. Then she took on responsibility for rehabilitations
services as a senior manager, administrator, and assistant vice president
for the Regional Rehabilitation Center. In January 1997, she became the
vice president of general services for PCMH.
On its 20th
anniversary, September 16, 1997, the Regional Rehabilitation Center at
PCMH opened its new aquatic therapy pool with a dedication ceremony and
an open house to which the public was invited. The $1.6 million pool had
been envisioned since the center opened. It had been designed and built
after surveying 12 other aquatic therapy facilities across the country.
The Greenville Service League supported the pools construction with
a $300,000 gift.
The pools
water temperature would be kept between 90 and 94 degrees, and the air
temperature inside the building that housed the pool 2 to 3 degrees warmer
than the water.
There were
recreational, physical, and occupational therapists on the Rehabilitation
Center staff who would lead aquatic therapy. Having the pool allowed them
to expand the swim therapy program that had been carried on at the Greenville
Aquatics and Fitness Center pool. Being able to use the rehabilitation
center pool would help both outpatients and inpatients with complications
resulting from stroke, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries,
and arthritis.
In April,
1999, the Commission for the Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities
granted the Regional Rehabilitation Center at PCMH, along with the centers
six specialized rehabilitation programs, a three year re-accreditation.
The most recent previous accreditation had been in 1995. The center was
evaluated on its comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program and vocational
evaluation services, as well as on its specialty programs in pediatric,
brain injury, and spinal cord injury rehabilitation. The centers
speech-language pathology and audiology services were accredited also
by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association as part of the CARF
survey process.
The rehabilitation
center was commended for communication among staff, physicians, and administrators,
for its patient satisfaction level, the expertness of its staff and medical
staff, and its facilities, particularly the aquatic therapy pool. Areas
needing improvement were arranging information in order of priority, managing
outcomes, and streamlining daily patient care documentation.
Dr. Phillip
Bryant, the centers medical director and chairman of the Physical
Medicine and Rehabilitation department at the ECU medical school, said
surveys were valuable in judging how the rehab center stood in relation
to established benchmarks. He said, It allows us to get a better
understanding of standards we should be achieving and helps us continue
our pursuit of excellence in rehabilitation.
Gary Lewis,
more than 50 years old in 2000, has made great progress since he left
the VA Hospital. He was fortunate to obtain work in the sheltered workshop
in Pitt County, and when the Regional Rehabilitation Center opened he
began therapy for his disabled legs and learned office skills. He works
as office manager for an engineering firm in Greenville and attends ViQuest
Center, where the University Health Systems carries on its wellness programs,
twice a week. There he exercises in the pool, is given physical therapy,
and uses the cardiovascular and training equipment to benefit his heart
and upper body. As evidence of the centers impact, people like Gary
can live in Greenville, while receiving comprehensive rehabilitation services
and lifelong help in keeping well, without having to leave home. |
|